{
    "data": {
        "instructionText": "<div class='Questiontxt'><div class='que_txt'><div class='inst_box'><p>Review the statements involving employment relationships listed below and determine if the relationship would cause a violation by answering In violation or In compliance.</p><p class='inst'>Select the circle corresponding to each statement. You must answer all questions to proceed to the next screen.</p></div></div></div>",
        "downloadAndroidImages": "activity_icon.png,kc_assets_2.png",
        "downloadIpadImages": "activity_icon.png,kc_assets_2.png",
        "downloadImages": "activity_icon.png,kc_assets_2.png",
        "pageAssets": {
            "mcssInt": {
                "questionText": "",
                "instText": "",
                "finalText": "<p></p>",
                "options": [{
                        "id": "1",
                        "optImage": "",
                        "optImage1": "",
                        "optText": "Two audit senior associates have decided to work at their local gym to take advantage of the free gym membership awarded to employees. When they first started working at the gym, it didn’t interfere with their work at KPMG and because they were able to manage their day job, they didn’t think to report it. However, they later realize that the gym is an affiliate of an audit client.",
                        "radio_text0": "",
                        "radio_text1": "",
                        "correctAns": "1",
                        "correct": "<p><b>That’s correct.</b><br />A violation has occurred, which must be reported to the Audit Committee because professionals <b>cannot</b> be simultaneously employed by the firm and at an audit client or its affiliates. If the individuals had initiated the Outside Employment process prior to beginning their work at the gym, as required by firm policy, the restriction would have been identified and the violation avoided.</p>",
                        "incorrect": "<p><b>That’s incorrect.</b><br />A violation has occurred, which must be reported to the Audit Committee because professionals <b>cannot</b> be simultaneously employed by the firm and at an audit client or its affiliates. If the individuals had initiated the Outside Employment process prior to beginning their work at the gym, as required by firm policy, the restriction would have been identified and the violation avoided.</p>"

                    },
                    {
                        "id": "2",
                        "optImage": "",
                        "optImage1": "",
                        "optText": "The spouse of an advisory director providing non-audit services to the audit client has just accepted an entry-level job within the marketing department at the audit client.",
                        "radio_text0": "",
                        "radio_text1": "",
                        "correctAns": "2",
                        "correct": "<b>That’s correct.</b><br /> Although the director would be considered a Covered Person (providing non-audit services) to the audit client, the accepted position is <b>not</b> in an accounting or financial reporting oversight role, so it would constitute a permissible employment relationship.",
                        "incorrect": "<b>That’s incorrect.</b><br /> Although the director would be considered a Covered Person (providing non-audit services) to the audit client, the accepted position is <b>not</b> in an accounting or financial reporting oversight role, so it would constitute a permissible employment relationship."
                    }
                ],
                "correctFB": "",
                "incorrectFB": "",
                "table_heading":"Statement",
                "choices": [
                    "In<br/>Violation",
                    "In<br/>Compliance"
                ]
            }
        }
    }
}